The BBC is running this story over the
Outcry over N Korea missile test. Now, I am not condoning their actions, far from it, but doesn't it smack of hypocrisy and
sound very similar to this story?
"We" don't want Korea to have nuclear weapons and yet there are those in the UK government who want to
spend billions of pounds on updating our nuclear arsenal. (I wish I had the guts and ability to with-hold my taxes as I'm horrified that my money should be spent on such abominations.)
Sixty years on from
Hiroshima and Nagasaki it is estimated that there are approximately 35,000 nuclear weapons in the world. The bomb dropped on Nagasaki killed roughly 70,000 people outright and a further 70,000 later died from radiation related illnesses/injuries. How many more developed cancers and other nasties in the years that followed?
It is estimated that the world arsenal actually equates (in fire power) to 500,000 bombs of the size that were dropped in Japan. So, on average, one of these newer bombs could be about 15 times more powerful. Drop one of those on a city and you could kill up to a million people with a massive fall-out causing incalculable damage and a heavily polluted world weather system.
We don't just need to persuade Korea to stop developing and maintaining nuclear warheads, we need to look to the weapons of mass destruction on our own soil.